Ohio legislation seeks felony charges for repeat voyeurs

Farah Siddiqi

By Savana Capp / Broadcast version by Farah Siddiqi reporting for the Kent State NewsLab-Ohio News Connection Collaboration.

Ohio legislators are considering increasing the penalty for repeat voyeurism in Ohio, as newer technology and smaller cameras makes it easier for voyeuristic crimes to be committed. 

The current charges for voyeurism, acts of invading someone else’s privacy typically for the purpose of sexual gratification, range from a misdemeanor to a fifth-degree felony. House Bill 110 introduced Feb. 18 by state representatives Josh Williams, R-Sylvania Township, and Cecil Thomas, D-Cincinnati, would increase the penalty from a misdemeanor of the first degree to a felony of the third degree if the offender has previously pleaded guilty to or been convicted of two or more of the same voyeurism violation. 

“I think the individual's right to privacy should always be paramount,” Williams said. “I think the state has an interest in preserving an individual’s right to privacy especially in their most intimate moments.” 

The case that got him interested in this legislation came from his own district near Toledo. A man was arrested after allegedly putting a camera in a toilet at St. Vincent Medical Center. There was another recent case in Kent where a man was arrested and charged with voyeurism for allegedly taking photos of a woman in a store’s fitting room.

While using hidden cameras is already criminal in Ohio, Williams said the penalties are not high enough. 

“For voyeurism, recording someone for your own sexual gratification, violating their privacy, making them feel so violated in their most vulnerable moments,” Williams said, “we need to increase those penalties, so individuals that are trying to perpetrate those types of crimes in the state of Ohio understand that that type of deviant behavior is not going to be permitted.” 

Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the designated sexual assault coalition for Ohio, supports this bill. The OAESV works to support all of the rape crisis centers in Ohio and advocates for more protective legislation.

Emily Gemar, OAESV director of public policy, said voyeurism can be a part of a larger abuse pattern. With the evolution of technology, she has seen a lot more voyeuristic and digital crimes. 

“We know that it’s not always a one-and-done type of offense, it can be very repetitive,” Gemar said. “It can involve a lot of surveillance of somebody and multiple violations of their privacy over a long period of time.” 

Gemar explained that while it often starts with something like spying, it can lead to stalking and physical sex offenses. 

In a sexual assault in Ohio study from 2016-2023, the Department of Public Safety found voyeurism and importuning, soliciting a minor under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity, to be the lowest reported offenses of all sexual assault. 

Gemar said voyeurism, like most sexual offenses, is not commonly reported and leads to feelings of helplessness during and after the incident. 

“This crime, like many sex crimes, can cause really deep feelings of violation and powerlessness and the trauma can be long-lasting,” Gemar said. 

If the act of voyeurism involved taking pictures or images, the victim can feel even more powerless because of the difficulty in working to truly remove them from the internet, Gemar said. 

Williams said there has also been an increased market for invasive hidden camera videos on OnlyFans and other adult websites. 

Along with public restrooms, hidden cameras have been found in smoke detectors, shower heads, dorm rooms, phone chargers and light switches in Airbnb’s. 

“Victims can become distrustful of others, especially in settings that they once believed were private or intimate,” Gemar said. “It can affect their sense of safety at home, at work or in public places, and that really isolates victims.” 

As it stands, the current statute says no matter how many times someone violates section A (no person for the purpose of sexual gratification shall surreptitiously invade the privacy of another) or B (no person shall surreptitiously film or photograph another person in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy), it is only a misdemeanor. 

With a rise in voyeuristic and digital crimes, other states have also been reevaluating their penalties, Williams said. South Carolina and New York are among them. 

“I don't think this is a controversial bill at all,” he said. “So as soon as it gets moving, it’ll move fast.”


This collaboration is produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.